|
First-time investor skeptical of Realtor ethics How can I get unbiased information on good rental areas? Thursday, May 13, 2004
By Robert GriswoldInman News
|
|||
|
Question: I am thinking about buying my first rental
property. Naturally, I want to buy a house or condo that will be easy to rent
and that will turn profitable as soon as possible. I am looking throughout my
area, but I have this feeling that most real estate agents would just try to
sell me something in their specific neighborhood whether that area is good for
rental properties or not. Then last night I saw a real estate expert on
television advising that the best deals are on rental properties in other parts
of the country. I am confused and don't know which advice is right. How can I
get unbiased information that could help me decide where to buy? Property manager Griswold replies: You are facing one of the most common dilemmas for new real
estate investors. First, your concerns about your local agents are valid.
However, understand that real estate agents often specialize in specific
neighborhoods and they cannot be experts in all areas of town. So it is natural
that they feel most comfortable showing clients properties that meet the
client's general needs in those specific neighborhoods where they have the most
knowledge and experience. This is actually in your best interests as well. My suggestion is that you need to get feedback from a
variety of agents about different areas of your region and narrow down the
potential areas to ones that you feel have the best long-term prospects. The
best due diligence information would be from local sources, such as the Chamber
of Commerce, the local planning or building department, and any economic
development agencies in the area whose primary mission is to attract new
businesses and industry to the area. These resources are readily available in
most areas and you want information on jobs and population growth as well as
future development. I always advise to determine the areas in the "path of
progress" rather than the areas that are mature and even declining. While
redevelopment areas can also be quite promising, the areas where new retail and
commercial properties have been developed are clearly a good indicator of
future prosperity. For example, a new building improvement center, major
warehouse retailer or even a fast-food chain can be a catalyst and an indicator
of where growth is and will likely to continue to occur. Once you have identified the general geographic areas that
are promising, you should check the neighborhood for "For Rent" signs
and call the owners and ask them about rents, frequency of tenant turnover, and
length of vacancies. Look for a tenant profile that is stable and likely to
continue to rent even when there are many new homes in the market. For example,
the military, major corporations and medical care providers often have
employees with good incomes, but their job requirements do not allow them to
make the commitment to home ownership. You should also talk to several property
managers with properties in the area to determine their perspective and
experience with the local rental market. I am not a proponent of investing in
out-of-town properties regardless of the potential, so I would suggest that you
buy in an area that you know very well and ideally is within a one-hour drive
of where you live. Question: I have a lease that runs for nearly eight more
months. I needed to break my lease because I got laid off from my job. My
landlord has re-rented the flat to another tenant and they move in the day
after I leave. My landlord rented the flat for $130 less per month and he is
trying to collect the difference from my $3,900 security deposit for the rest
of the lease, nearly 8 months, or $975! I know I owe him for the costs of
re-renting the flat, but according to the lease and state law it says he can't
collect double rent. Can he do this? Landlords' attorney Smith replies: When tenants break their leases they are responsible for
rent for the balance of the term. As the landlord's attorney, I am going to
give the landlord the benefit of the doubt on the facts. It appears that $130
per month on the shortfall is the best he could do in the present market at the
time of your move-out. Consider the landlord's dilemma. He could hold out for
the same rate or higher. This could take some time. Or, as here, he could
re-rent the unit out immediately for $130 a month less. If the landlord can
prove that, after diligence, that was the best rent he could get, then you're
going to be responsible for the difference. While it may be true the landlord
can't collect double rent, holding you responsible for the shortfall is not
collecting double rent. You'll need to pay this amount to avoid further legal
proceedings. This column on issues confronting tenants and landlords
is written by property manager Robert Griswold, author of "Property
Management for Dummies," and San Diego attorneys Steven R. Kellman,
director of the Tenant's Legal Center, and Ted Smith, principal in a firm
representing landlords. E-mail your questions to Rental Q&A at rgriswold.inman@retodayradio.com. Questions should be brief
and cannot be answered individually. Send tips or a letter to the editor to newsroom@inman.com or call (510) 658-9252, ext. 124. |
|
||
|
©Copyright 2004 Inman News web design and hosting by advancedaccess.com |
|||