|
New-home brochure misrepresents real estate dimensions Is home builder liable to buyer for missing 165 square feet? Monday, May 17, 2004
By Robert J. BrussInman News
|
|||
|
DEAR BOB: On Jan. 3, 2003, we moved into our brand-new
house. When we signed our purchase contract, we did so based on the builder's
brochure stating our home was approximately 1,875 square feet. However,
recently I noticed other nearby homes seem bigger than mine. While I was
measuring my basement for finishing, I decided to measure my home's square
footage. I measured the outside perimeter and discovered it is only 1,710
square feet. Even at a modest price per square foot, I feel the builder ripped
me off for at least $16,000. What legal options do I have? Dave S. DEAR DAVE: Measuring square footage of a home is a controversial
topic. I can cite you court decisions where even experienced appraisers
disagreed about a home's square footage. Purchase Bob Bruss reports online. If your measurement is correct, you are missing the size of
a very roomy extra bedroom. The general rule is a house is measured around the
outside perimeter, excluding the unfinished garage area. If you believe your home is 165 square feet less than was
represented to you, it's time to have a very polite conversation with your home
builder. Maybe there is a reasonable explanation. Should you still be convinced the builder misrepresented the
house's square footage, it's time to consult a local real estate attorney to
see if legal action against your builder would be worthwhile. MORTGAGE BROKER CLARIFIES HOME LOAN PRE-APPROVALS DEAR BOB: You were absolutely right. But you should have
been clearer in a recent article explaining home loan pre-approvals and how
they are different from pre-qualifications. I've been a mortgage broker since
1993. During that time, the mortgage lending business has changed dramatically.
As an independent, I have an established clientele of realty agents and
satisfied borrowers who keep me prospering. However, some of my mortgage broker
competitors mislead prospective borrowers by saying they are
"pre-qualified" for a home loan. As you correctly state, that's
worthless because the mortgage broker is just a "middleperson" who is
not the actual lender. However, you failed to emphasize mortgage brokers can
"shop" loan applications to many actual lenders and obtain written mortgage
pre-approval letters valid for 60 to 90 days. That's what I do every day for my
prospective borrowers. One mortgage broker advantage you failed to emphasize,
however, is we have lender contacts with "unusual" lenders who will
finance unique situations, such as combination residence and retail property.
We also know which lenders offer mortgages at reasonable terms to borrowers
with low FICO (Fair Isaac and Co) credit scores Alicia H. DEAR ALICIA: Thank you for your great e-mail. I couldn't
have stated the situation better for mortgage brokers. Misleading mortgage
pre-qualification letters from mortgage brokers are virtually worthless because
the broker isn't lending the money. All that matters is a written mortgage
pre-approval letter or certificate from an actual lender (which mortgage
brokers can obtain) who promises to loan money to buy the home. CONSEQUENCES OF SIGNING A BLANK IRS FORM 4506 DEAR BOB: When we closed our recent mortgage refinance, we
were told the IRS required us to sign a blank Form 4506 to verify we weren't
laundering money. We signed the form with only our names and address, as
requested. The name of the lender was left blank, as was the date. Within a
month, we were notified our mortgage was sold. I phoned the IRS yesterday, after
reading your article about IRS Form 4506, and was told we could mail a letter
to the IRS requesting our Form 4506 not be honored. Is there any way we can
rescind our signing of that blank form? My husband and I do not want this new
lender or any other company to have unlimited blank access to our tax returns
every year. This seems very scary and like "creepy" Big Brother to me
Kathy B. DEAR KATHY: Now you know why it is so important for home
mortgage borrowers to sign, date and name the originating lender on the IRS
Form 4506, which most mortgage lenders ask borrowers to sign. As you discovered, when your home loan was sold to another
lender in the secondary mortgage market, as happens to most home mortgages, if
you have an undated IRS Form 4506 in the file with no lender's name on it, that
is a virtual invitation to the eventual loan owner to pry into your private tax
returns years from now. Sorry, I am unaware of any method to rescind the blank
IRS form you signed. REVERSE MORTGAGE LETS SENIOR HOMEOWNER CHANGE HIS MIND DEAR BOB: I got a reverse mortgage three years ago and
thought it would take care of my lifetime financial needs. But I have since
encountered medical and automobile problems that required I use my credit cards
to pay. Now I need to pay off my credit cards. I have contacted local banks
about a second mortgage but they won't make a second mortgage loan behind a
reverse mortgage. What should I do? Frank W. DEAR FRANK: You have several alternatives. The easiest one
is to contact your reverse mortgage loan servicer to ask for a lump-sum advance
to pay your debts. However, this choice will reduce your lifetime monthly
payments to be received on your reverse mortgage. Another alternative, if your home has substantially
appreciated in market value since you obtained your reverse mortgage three
years ago, is to refinance it with a new reverse mortgage. In the last three years, the loan limits of reverse mortgage
lenders have increased substantially. Although there will be up-front reverse
mortgage refinance fees, it might be worthwhile to pay off those unexpected
debts. More details are in my new special report, "Secrets of Tax-Free
Reverse Mortgage Income for Senior Citizen Homeowners," available for $4
from Robert Bruss, 251 Park Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 or by credit card at
1-800-736-1736 or instant Internet download at www.bobbruss.com. WILL INSURANCE PAY IF TENANTS BURN UP APARTMENT BUILDING? DEAR BOB: Our town (wisely, in my opinion) recently enacted
an ordinance prohibiting outdoor grills on apartment balconies. I am an
investor-owner of an apartment building that has many outdoor balconies. Due to
the nice weather, I recently observed several of my tenants using their outdoor
grills on their balconies. But I didn't want to spoil their enjoyment so I
didn't say anything. Since the ordinance isn't being enforced, if a fire
damages my building, could my insurance company refuse to pay because a local
ordinance was violated? Alfonso H. DEAR ALFONSO: Congratulations to your town officials for
enacting such a wise ordinance. But unless your fire insurance policy prohibits outdoor
grills on the apartment balconies (highly unlikely), your insurer will be
obligated to pay a fire damage claim if one of your tenants' grills causes fire
damage to the building. However, after paying the fire damage claim, your insurer
then is likely to subrogate (which means "stand in the shoes") to
your rights to sue your tenant for negligence. The local ordinance is strong
evidence of the danger of grills on apartment balconies. To prevent such a fire loss, I suggest you (1) politely
notify your tenants in writing of the new ordinance and (2) contact the local
fire prevention officer to suggest he or she mail a notice of the new ordinance
to local apartment building owners and to "occupant" tenants. You
will be amazed how eager most fire prevention officers are to avoid fire
losses. MUST CONDO OWNER PAY FOR FIRE INSURANCE BILL? DEAR BOB: I just received a bill for $265 to pay the fire
insurance policy on the condo building where I live in a 12-unit all-brick
complex. I have lived in three other condos and have never had to pay for fire
insurance. Shouldn't the insurance bill be paid by my monthly assessments?
Arlene C. DEAR ARLENE: Yes. You should not receive a special
assessment for the annual fire insurance premium for your condo complex. The condominium homeowner's association is responsible for
buying adequate fire and liability insurance for the common areas of your
12-unit complex, including the structure. It is very unusual for a homeowner's association to bill the
individual owners for their share, which should be paid from your monthly fees.
I will presume this bill is not for your personal condo
owner's insurance, which every condo owner needs. An individual condo owner's
insurance policy insures the contents of your condo from loss due to fire,
water damage, theft and other causes. It also includes liability coverage in
case your guest is injured within your condo. Unless your condo homeowner's association is broke, it is
extremely unusual for an insurance bill to be sent to each condo owner. I
suggest you consult the president of your condo homeowner's association for an
explanation. Something appears to be seriously wrong with the homeowner's
association. For more details, please consult a local real estate attorney. The new Robert Bruss special report, "Secrets of Real
Estate Leverage to Buy Your Home or Investment Property for Virtually No
Cash," is now available for $4 from Robert Bruss, 251 Park Road,
Burlingame, CA 94010 or by credit card at 1-800-736 -1736 or instant Internet
download at www.bobbruss.com. Questions
for this column are welcome at either address. Real Estate Center). Send tips or a letter to the editor to newsroom@inman.com or call (510) 658-9252, ext. 124. |
|
||
|
©Copyright 2004 Inman News web design and hosting by advancedaccess.com |
|||